Nosodes are Homeopathic Remedies
	
	 Nosodes are homeopathic remedies that are made from the specific 
products of a particular disease. This can be tissue containing 
the actual disease agents or tissue affected by those agents. 
Sometimes nosodes are made from vaccines containing the organisms. 
The nosodes are prepared in a diluted and potential form just like 
all other homeopathic medicine.
Nosodes are homeopathic remedies that are made from the specific 
products of a particular disease. This can be tissue containing 
the actual disease agents or tissue affected by those agents. 
Sometimes nosodes are made from vaccines containing the organisms. 
The nosodes are prepared in a diluted and potential form just like 
all other homeopathic medicine.
 
	There is no potential for an animal 
to become infected with a given disease agent from a nosode because 
of the pharmaceutical process that occurs which dilutes and inactivates 
any viable organisms. Nosodes seem to work most effectively, homeopathically, 
when they are given near or at the time of exposure. For instance, 
giving a Parvovirus Nosode immediately before and after a potential 
exposure would provide the best protection from the Nosode.
	Homeopathic nosodes can be used when your companion becomes at risk 
for a disease before three months of age, or if warranted, in unvaccinated 
animals to help protect against some contagious diseases. Many 
guardians use these homeopathic medicines to help protect their companions 
against Parvovirus, Distemper, and Kennel Cough in dogs and Panleukopenia 
and FIP in cats.
	There are many reasons for Homeopathic medicines to be "animal friendly"
	Dr. Charles Loops D.V. M. Homeopathic medicines are 
"animal friendly" for several reasons. Because their action works 
across the mucous membranes of the mouth, it is not necessary to swallow 
the medicine. This makes it easier when dosing, since the mouth 
doesn't have to be opened and the remedy can be placed on the gum or 
inside the lip. The single dose powder is sweet tasting as it 
is in a lactose sugar base and the liquid remedies are diluted at home 
before giving, so that the alcohol taste is not a problem. Even 
cats generally do not mind taking their medicine. In fact, they 
often get excited when the bottle appears.
	Homeopathic Antidote to Minimize the Side Effects of Vaccine Damage
	By law, an animal must be vaccinated against rabies every three years. 
To protect your pet, you can request a homeopathic antidote to minimize 
the side effects of vaccine damage from Dr. Charlie Loops. For 
rabies vaccine, the remedy is "lyssin". The cost $6.00 for single doses 
and $15. for 1/4 ounce bottles for repeated dosing. Some nosodes seem 
to work more effectively than others. None produce titers against 
disease like a vaccination, so they are not vaccine replacements. 
They do seem to moderate a disease condition if the animal is exposed, 
even if they don't prevent it. Homeopathic nosodes are another option 
for guardians who wish to avoid vaccinations. Nosodes cost $15. each 
and provide many doses. They are dosed "as needed" and instructions 
are provided.
	 
	Alternative Vaccines
	by Randall Neustaedter
	
	 Conventional vaccines prepared by modern vaccine manufacturers represent 
only one form of disease-specific prevention. Vaccines and preventive 
medicines are also available to parents in homeopathic form. There is 
a long history within homeopathic 
medicine of attempting to prevent specific diseases, especially 
during epidemics.
Conventional vaccines prepared by modern vaccine manufacturers represent 
only one form of disease-specific prevention. Vaccines and preventive 
medicines are also available to parents in homeopathic form. There is 
a long history within homeopathic 
medicine of attempting to prevent specific diseases, especially 
during epidemics.
	The medicines used in homeopathic form consist of two classes. One 
class includes those substances obtained from the natural world of plants, 
minerals, and animal products. The second class, called nosodes, includes 
substances derived from disease products, tissue samples, mucus, pus 
from discharges, or pure cultures of microorganisms.
Nosodes correspond to the specific diseases 
associated with the individual bacteria or virus, or the infectious 
material sample taken from a patient. Both of these classes have been 
used to prevent disease. Examples of this include Lathyrus sativa (a 
plant) for polio and Pertussin (a preparation of the bacteria Bordetella 
pertussis) for whooping cough.
    A medicine that has proven effective for a specific epidemic of a 
disease in the community can be used as the preventive for other cases 
of that disease, though homeopaths tend to use those medicines that 
have proven themselves in the past. As a general rule, homeopaths utilize 
the nosode of the infectious organism to prevent disease. Nosodes are 
named with the Latin terms for the infection or organism, Morbillinum 
for measles, Diphtherinum for diphtheria.
    This method of homeopathic prophylaxis has been formulated into strategies 
and rules of two types - short-term prevention during epidemics and 
long-term prevention.
    
     Experience with the use of nosodes during epidemics has led to a 
level of confidence and optimism about the protective effect of this 
method. Since the mid-nineteenth century, homeopaths have attempted 
to prevent or limit the spread of disease during epidemics, with some 
success. Most of the experience with this approach occurred during the 
era preceding the availability of vaccines. Homeopaths reported a decrease 
in the severity and frequency of disease in those patients who received 
the nosode preventively.
Experience with the use of nosodes during epidemics has led to a 
level of confidence and optimism about the protective effect of this 
method. Since the mid-nineteenth century, homeopaths have attempted 
to prevent or limit the spread of disease during epidemics, with some 
success. Most of the experience with this approach occurred during the 
era preceding the availability of vaccines. Homeopaths reported a decrease 
in the severity and frequency of disease in those patients who received 
the nosode preventively.
    The method of homeopathic prophylaxis has never been rigorously tested. 
Nonetheless, there is some evidence suggesting that homeopathic medicines 
do act to prevent diseases during epidemics. One study observed the 
occurrence of meningitis in a group of children who received a homeopathic 
preventive (Meningococcinum 10c in a single dose) during a 1974 epidemic 
in Brazil. Of the 18,640 children given the homeopathic nosode, 4 developed 
meningitis (0.02 percent), compared to 32 cases in the 6,340 unvaccinated 
children (0.5 percent). This represents a significant difference in 
a controlled study, although the control group was not randomized (Castro 
and Nogueira, 1975). Eisfelder reported an uncontrolled study of 50,000 
children who received Lathyrus, a homeopathic preparation used to treat 
paralysis, in varying potencies during the polio epidemic of the 1950s. 
Only one of these children developed (non-paralytic) polio. The general 
population had a significantly higher rate of polio than 1 in 50,000 
(Eisfelder, 1961).
    These studies do not prove the effectiveness of homeopathic prophylaxis 
in epidemics, but many homeopathic practitioners have been convinced 
by their own experience with this form of disease prevention. The practice 
of using homeopathic preparations to prevent disease during epidemic 
exposure may be effective. The medicines cause no adverse effects, and, 
in the absence of any other form of prevention, there was no reason 
not to use them. In an epidemic of a serious disease their use is still 
warranted, though there are valid reasons to allow children to undergo 
the milder childhood occurrence of measles, mumps and chickenpox to 
acquire lifelong immunity.
    Alternative vaccines in homeopathic form are also available for long-term 
prevention. Several protocols exist for the administration of homeopathic 
nosodes or the corresponding remedies for the prevention of whooping 
cough, meningitis, diphtheria, tetanus, polio, and other diseases during 
childhood. There exists significant controversy within the homeopathic 
profession about the appropriateness of using these preparations for 
long-term prevention. This controversy involves the areas of effectiveness, 
safety, and ethics.
    No long-term studies have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy 
of this form of prevention. There is no reason to assume that these 
vaccines continue to act preventively years after administration, unless 
immunity is shown through an objective test or clinical studies.
    Homeopathic preparations have not been shown to raise antibody levels. 
Smits tested the titre of antibodies to diphtheria, polio and tetanus 
in ten children before and one month after giving homeopathic preparations 
of these three vaccines (DTPol 30K and 200K). He found no rise in antibody 
levels (Smits, 1995). He speculates that protection afforded by a homeopathic 
remedy acts on a "deeper" level than that of antibodies. Other homeopaths 
have stated similar opinions. Golden says, "unlike conventional vaccines, 
the Homeopathic alternative does not rely on antibody formation." He 
postulates that "Homeopathic remedies reduce the patient’s sensitivity 
to the dynamic stimulus of the virus or bacteria, thus lessening the 
patient’s predisposition to being overcome by this stimulus" (Golden, 
1994).
If homeopathic remedies do not produce an increase in antibody levels, 
then the only way to measure the effectiveness of homeopathic prophylaxis 
is through clinical results. This is a formidable undertaking. The cost 
of long-term studies using homeopathic prophylaxis would be prohibitive, 
given the present resources available. Ethical problems could also prevent 
such studies from occurring; it is doubtful that ethics committees would 
allow children to be deprived of the commonly administered and approved 
allopathic vaccines. Moskowitz has suggested that the sizable population 
of unvaccinated children whose parents have refused vaccines, could 
provide a control group to assess the long-term negative effects of 
vaccines (Moskowitz, 1985). Perhaps this population could also serve 
as a test group for homeopathic prophylaxis.
Parents need to understand that there is no evidence to support the 
use of these homeopathic preparations for long-term prevention. There 
is nothing in the literature that shows homeopathic prophylaxis provides 
lasting immunity from specific diseases
Handbook of Homeopathic Alternatives to Immunizations by Susan 
Curtis BA, MCH, RShom
This book was written as a practical guide to explain what homeopathy 
has to offer as alternatives to immunization
	 
	Nosodes as an Alternative to Vaccines in Veterinary Medicine
	Veterinary homeopaths in the past did not have access to any vaccine 
or antibiotics and they hit this illness head on with their various 
homeopathic medicines and nosodes. Research into the old texts many 
of which are out of print and only found in the archives of universities 
have produced information which may be of value for today.
	In the 1830s veterinarian Doctor Wilhelm Lux was called to attend 
a flock of sheep that were dying of Anthrax. This German scientist had 
previously experienced success using nosodes to prevent and treat other 
diseases in livestock.[J. H. Clarke, M.D. Dictionary of Materia Medica, 
Vol.. pg. 118-119] Dr. Lux prepared an alcoholic extract from the spleen 
of the sheep that had just died. Soon a number of physicians and veterinarians 
were employing this new homeopathic medicine for their patients who 
were suffering with serious illnesses. The lives of both sheep and their 
shepherds were being spared by his gift of Anthracinum. [C. Hering, 
M. D., The Guiding Symptoms of Our Materia Medica, Vol. 1, pg. 299]
	Kennel Cough is best known Case Study
	In veterinary medicine, probably the best known study was done by 
Dr. Christopher Day of England involving `kennel cough' in a boarding 
kennel. At the time he was called in, there were 40 dogs in the kennel 
with 35 that had kennel cough. About half had been vaccinated for this 
malady. He gave a nosode to all the animals that were there and all 
the dogs that came in through the rest of the summer (another 214 dogs). 
He successfully reduced the incidence of kennel cough from over 90% 
to less than 2%. (Sorry Charlie, nothing is 100% foolproof.)
	 Nosodes have been developed and used 
successfully for almost all animal disease and more recently for `heartworm'. 
The late Dr. George MacLeod, in his book "Dogs: Homeopathic Remedies" 
had this to say about nosodes: "…gives a more solid immunity inasmuch 
as it incorporates the entire defense system, which is mobilized as 
soon as the vaccine is taken into the mouth and builds up protection 
with each further dose. This build-up leads from tonsillar tissue through 
the lymphatics incorporating the entire reticuloendothelial system. 
This procedure is equivalent to what is known as `street infection' 
viz., ingestion of virus etc. during daily contact with other animals, 
when immunity would be built up in the same way."
 "…There are no side effects when using homeopathic 
oral vaccines-a reaction may sometimes be observed…but such reaction 
is transient and soon passes."
 "…Another advantage in protection by homeopathic 
means, is that vaccination can be started very early in the pup's life, 
e.g., within the first week if necessary. This does not interfere with 
the presence of any maternal antibodies."
 Nosodes appear to stimulate the entire 
natural immune system to react against a specific disease. One of the 
many reasons that they have not been accepted in the `orthodox' medical 
community, is that they do not produce specific, measurable antibodies! 
This `titer testing' is of little value in measuring effective immunity 
from nosode usage. Again, because the `mechanism' of action is poorly 
understood, the 'orthodox' reaction is to reject all evidence as merely 
`anecdotal.' Perhaps the `challenge' study by Dr. Schultz will provide 
more acceptable evidence to this mentality.
	 
	The 
Dangers of Vaccinations and the Advantages of Nosodes for Disease Prevention
	by Dr. Donna Starita Mehan
The purpose of vaccination is to protect your pet from potentially 
fatal infections by pathogenic (disease-causing) viruses such as distemper, 
rabies,and others. The way this is done is to inject either a killed 
or a "modified" (non-pathogenic) live virus, which sensitizes the immune 
system to that particular virus. Thereafter, if your dog or cat is exposed 
to, let's say, parvo virus, s/he will be able to respond quickly and 
vigorously, producing antibodies to overcome the infection.
This sounds like a pretty good plan, on the surface. However, as 
with any medical procedure, we must ask the simple and direct questions, 
"Is it safe? Is it effective? Do the benefits outweigh the risks?"
	The Problem with Routine Vaccinations
	Routine" vaccination, as it is practiced today, is not always effective 
(especially in the case of the feline leukemia vaccine), and frequently 
has adverse side-effects, either short or long term. With the use of 
multivalent (combination: 4 in 1, 6 in 1, etc.) vaccines that are repeated 
year after year, the frequency and severity of these side-effects in 
our pets has increased dramatically.
	Not surprisingly, most of the problems involve the immune system. 
After all, the immune system is what vaccines are designed to stimulate. 
But they do so in a very unnatural way that can overwhelm and confuse 
the immune system. The body may overreact to normally harmless substances 
(allergies, especially flea allergies and other skin problems), or even 
produce antibodies to itself (autoimmune disease). At the same time, 
the body may be sluggish in responding to those things that it should 
reject, such as common viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites. This 
can result in increased susceptibility to acute infections (such as 
ear infections in dogs, bladder infections in cats), chronic tapeworm 
problems, or in more degenerative cases, cancer.
	Lack of Alternatives
	The big question has always been: What alternative is there? Despite 
these potential problems, vaccination must surely be preferable to losing 
puppies and kittens to distemper, parvo, and other fatal diseases! Until 
recently, there have been no practical alternatives, so the short term 
benefits of vaccination have seemed to outweigh the long term risks. 
Now, however, there is a safe and effective alternative to vaccination:
homeopathic nosodes.
	Homeopathic Nosodes: a Better Alternative
	 nosode is simply a homeopathic remedy that is made from a disease 
product. Nosodes are not in any way infections, and can be used in the 
same way as vaccines, that is, to prevent viral infection. Like vaccines, 
nosodes sensitize the body to a particular virus, so the immune system 
can react quickly and effectively to natural exposure. Nosodes are at 
least as effective as vaccines, and in some cases have been shown to 
be significantly more effective than vaccines in preventing infection.
	The biggest advantage of nosodes over vaccines is the fact that they 
are completely safe. There are no risks or side-effects whatever. And 
they can be safely given to puppies and kittens much earlier than vaccines 
can. In fact, the mother can be treated before she gives birth, giving 
the puppies or kittens protection from the moment they are born.
	Nosodes, like all homeopathic 
remedies, are very easy to administer: they are given by mouth, 
and don't even need to be swallowed. They are also very economical - 
far less expensive, in fact, than vaccination.
	Limitations of Nosodes
	There are some limitations to the use of nosodes. Rabies vaccination 
for dogs is required by law in most counties, and the rabies nosode, 
called Lyssin, will not satisfy that requirement. You should 
know, however, for the health of your animal, that all vaccines, including 
rabies are legally and medically approved for use in healthy animals 
only! So if your dog is showing any signs of acute or chronic disease, 
he or she is exempt from that requirement and should not be vaccinated.
	Despite the obvious advantages of nosodes, most boarding 
kennels and veterinary hospitals will not accept them in lieu of vaccination. 
If you need to board your dog or cat in a boarding kennel or veterinary 
hospital, you may be forced to have him/her vaccinated. This is a problem 
that will hopefully improve with time as more kennel owners and veterinarians 
become familiar with nosodes.
	Therapeutic Use of Nosodes
	Donna Starita Mehan, DMV
	In addition to helping prevent specific viral diseases with prophylactic 
use, nosodes can be used even after exposure to a virus has taken place. 
If given immediately after exposure, before symptoms develop, these 
nosodes can prevent the development of clinical disease.
Viral diseases such a feline leukemia, feline infectious peritonitis, 
canine distemper and canine parvo virus are usually incurable with conventional 
medical treatment (antibiotics, steroids, etc.). However, they frequently 
respond very quickly and favorably to homeopathic treatment. If your 
pet shows any symptoms of illness, specific, individualized homeopathic 
treatment will be needed. Due to the potential seriousness of these 
conditions, you should seek professional help.
	 
	Veterinary Homeopath does not Recommend Routine Vaccination
	Dr. Charles Loops D.V. M.
	As a veterinary homeopath, I do not recommend routine vaccination for 
dogs or cats, except for rabies in health dogs. If, for whatever reason, 
you decide that you must vaccinate your pet, I would make the following 
recommendations:
	
	- Never vaccinate an animal with symptoms of acute or chronic 
health problems, or at the time of surgery or any other physical 
or emotional stress.
- Vaccinate for one disease at a time that is, avoid multivalent 
(combination) vaccines. For cats, vaccinate for feline panleukopenia 
alone. The vaccines for the two upper respiratory viruses (calicivirus 
and rhinotracheitis) can be given together. I strongly recommend 
against vaccination for feline leukemia or feline infectious peritonitis 
virus. The vaccine is ineffective, and in my opinion, extremely 
hazardous. For dogs, give parvo separately from distemper. 
	Do not vaccinate for leptospirosis, hepatitis, or parainfluenza. Never 
give the rabies vaccine at the same time as any other vaccine.
- Avoid modified live virus vaccines whenever possible. Get killed 
virus vaccines, especially for rabies, canine parvo virus, and feline 
panleukopenia. (The canine distemper/hepatitis vaccine is not available 
in a killed virus form).
- For middle ages dogs and cats, vaccinate every 2-3 years, instead 
of yearly.
- After vaccination, give a dose of Thuja 30c. 
Wait one week, then give a dose of Sulfur 6x once daily for 7 days.
 
	Homeopathy, Immunity, Vaccinations, and Nosodes
An animal, properly fed and cared for, will have a significantly 
enhanced resistance to disease. The degree of resistance relies principally 
on nutrition and total care.
	Nosodes are typically used in a therapeutic manner, to treat patients 
with the same illness (isopathic), or a similar disease (homeopathic). 
For example, Psorinum, the mange remedy, is made from human scabies, 
and is useful in treating other skin conditions as well.
	Nosodes, when properly prescribed, are useful and safe for young 
animals who, while below the recommended age for vaccinations, have 
become ill with a particular preventable disease, or similar disease 
symptoms.
	When using nosodes to treat an existing illness, such as EPM and 
other seriously debilitating diseases, however, it would be a mistake 
to look at a nosode, or any other homeopathic remedy, as the only solution. 
One or more veterinarians should be consulted to evaluate the animal's 
situation, and the results that follow treatment. For instance, if Hypericum 
and the EPM nosode are given to two different horses, one horse may 
have tremendous improvement, and another horse may appear much worse. 
It is also vitally important to balance the nutrition, to support the 
horse with vitamin and possibly herb therapy, and to consider other 
therapies, to get him in a state of recovery. Finding a well-trained 
homeopathic veterinarian is important if you choose this route. A list 
of homeopathic veterinarians is available through the AVH and the AHVMA 
(see SIDE BAR).
	Regarding vaccinosis, if your animal is suffering from the ill-effects 
of a particular vaccination, the nosode of that particular disease could 
be used to antidote the effects. Some of the other remedies that may 
help the body rid itself of vaccinosis include Lachesis, Pulsatilla, 
Silicea, Sulphur, and Thuja. Chronic conditions, especially, are best 
left to the professional homeopath.
	Nosodes are also being used in a prophylactic, or preventive, manner, 
such as in healthy young animals below vaccination age. It is viewed 
by some as a way to expose the immune system to the energies of a disease, 
without exposing it to the disease itself, thereby stimulating an immune 
response. Unlike a vaccination, a nosode will not introduce foreign, 
and possibly harmful, substances into the body.
	It is believed by some homeopaths that energetic immunization can 
be achieved with nosodes, orally, via contact with the nervous system. 
There are more nerves in the mouth than anywhere else. In contrast to 
vaccinations, nosodes activate the entire defense system, energetically 
and physically, thereby yielding a more solid immunity.
	 
	Homeopathic Alternative to Vaccines
	Homeopathy is a complete system of healing, discovered 200 years 
ago by a German physician, Dr. Samuel Hahnemann. It has its own method 
of diagnosing and its own special remedies. The remedies are all natural, 
rarely have side-effects and are not addictive. They are safe for adults, 
the elderly as well as for infants and children. Even pregnant women 
can take the remedies safely. Homeopathic remedies are very effective 
in acute and chronic diseases. In the U.S., homeopathy is a legally 
recognized method of healing.
Nosodes are homeopathic preparations made from cultures of microbes 
and viruses. The nosode is prepared by serial dilution. Nosodes are 
administered in different two basic ways. In the case of nosodes from 
bacteria and viruses, the preparation carries the molecular imprint 
of the proteins and other constituents of the pathological agent. The 
working of the nosode is based on the fact that the immune system is 
sensitized to this molecular imprint without being exposed to the virulence 
of the living agent. The use of nosodes as a replacement for vaccination 
is based on this mechanism.
A nosode from a pathological agent, such as the measles, whooping 
cough (pertussis), etc., carries the molecular imprint of the agent 
and therefore sensitizes the immune system in such a way as to prepare 
the body for the defense against that same pathological agent. This 
is important in the case of children's diseases, where a primary infection 
is necessary to immunize the child, often for life, at a moment when 
the baby is highly vulnerable.
Whether a baby will be immunized with a vaccine or not, the administration 
of a nosode for each of the common children's diseases is an ideal way 
to start building immunity. Because of the fact that the agent is present 
in the nosode as an imprint and not as a virulent entity, it is a safe 
and gentle way to sensitize the immune system. It will protect against 
shock and serious consequences in the case of infection or vaccination
Related: 
Vaccines and preventive medicines are available to parents in safe and effective homeopathic form.
	Titers: What do they tell us?
	By Christie Keith
Many people who are trying to reduce vaccination are interested in 
using "titers" as a test to measure whether or not their dog is still 
immune to a disease. They often speak of titers as showing "high" or 
"low" immunity, or of "having to" re-vaccinate when a titer is low. 
While there is not a tremendous amount of research on titers in dogs, 
I think it's fair to say there is quite a bit of misunderstanding on 
the part of pet owners, and even many veterinarians, as to what a titer 
test does or does not tell us.
A "titer" is a measurement of how much antibody to a certain virus 
(or other antigen) is circulating in the blood at that moment. Titers 
are usually expressed in a ratio, which is how many times they could 
dilute the blood until they couldn't find antibodies anymore. So let's 
say they could dilute it two times only and then they didn't find anymore, 
that would be a titer of 1:2. If they could dilute it a thousand times 
before they couldn't find any antibody, then that would be a titer of 
1:1000.
	A titer test does not and cannot measure immunity, because immunity 
to specific viruses is reliant not on antibodies, but on memory cells, 
which we have no way to measure. Memory cells are what prompt the immune 
system to create antibodies and dispatch them to an infection caused 
by the virus it "remembers." Memory cells don't need "reminders" in 
the form of re-vaccination to keep producing antibodies. (Science, 1999; 
"Immune system's memory does not need reminders.") If the animal recently 
encountered the virus, their level of antibody might be quite high, 
but that doesn't mean they are more immune than an animal with a lower titer.